From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Waite Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:49:08 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot.h/bd_t missing fields needed by Linux IBM IIC I2C Interface Driver In-Reply-To: <20469.216.110.51.8.1075860771.squirrel@www.orkun.us> References: <13382.24.206.119.24.1075829319.squirrel@www.orkun.us> <20040203223322.881D3C10A3@atlas.denx.de> <20469.216.110.51.8.1075860771.squirrel@www.orkun.us> Message-ID: <200402040649.08593.waite@skycomputers.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tolunay, May I suggest that after you are done testing the kernel changes that you post a patch for inclusion to the linuxppc-2.4 tree onto the ppc dev mailing list. I agree the number of PPC trees, and their, relevance on a given day is hard to follow, but hopefully the linuxppc-2.4 tree can stay for a while. The only way to get changes into this tree though is for someone to test and incorporate them. It is tough, I know. I am still trying to get things into the 2.4 kernel, but that is the way of the kernel. If no one puts a little sweat to get it included, then it will never get included. Just my 2 cents Thanks Brian On Tuesday 03 February 2004 09:12 pm, listmember at orkun.us wrote: > > In message <13382.24.206.119.24.1075829319.squirrel@www.orkun.us> you > > > > wrote: > >> > No, the fields are useful and needed. We added these to our > >> > "linuxppc_2_4_devel" tree some time ago: > >> > >> linuxppc_2_4_devel did not have csb272 support. According to Dan Kegel > >> who > >> did the porting linuxppc_2_4_devel tree is dead and and not maintained > >> and > >> changes should go to linuxppc-2.4 instead. Also the above URL indicates > >> linux_2_4_devel is old. > > > > Well, feel free to ignore it, then. All I was trying to do is showing > > you where you can find a (tested and working) solution for your > > problem. Feel free to use the "new" and "living" linuxppc-2.4 source tree > > which does not contain the fixes you need. > > No, I was not implying anything or trying to be rude. I just reported what > I was told and initially though I should use linuxppc_2_4_devel from > linuxppc trees. It is a pity that all this stuff is scattered all around > each having bits and pieces I need but none is complete (to build CSB272 > kernel) :( > > >> Where can I get these changes? Is this your copy of linuxppc_2_4_devel > >> or > >> (so-called) official tree? > > > > As I wrote before: this is in the "linuxppc_2_4_devel" module on our > > CVS server. > > Sorry, it was not clear to me. Anyway, I copied ppcboot.h and > i2c-ibm_iic.c (due to different field name - one line change) from your > tree to the linuxppc tree and it worked. However, the new fields were not > intialized properly so driver somehow defaulted to sane values :) I am > using u-boot 1.0 . I guess I need to checkout u-boot from CVS and apply my > csb272 board changes to have them initialized properly. right? > > Best regards, > Tolunay > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot-Users mailing list > U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAINw0mxLCz0u+Ko8RAiHGAJ4qaDYryRe3KwKQhPAlfiHsjjRwNgCfQ8TO Q+tmx2/lPU82LKYWpWXIibU= =/8y1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----