From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Thu Feb 5 12:30:53 2004 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Adding ocfs support to blkid In-Reply-To: <20040205001132.GA12919@penguin.co.intel.com> References: <200402040838.i148cCqU002632@penguin.co.intel.com> <20040204185952.GA13452@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20040204233149.GA25620@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20040205001132.GA12919@penguin.co.intel.com> Message-ID: <20040205183046.GA26471@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Yeah, basically we haven't gotten around to it yet ;) Minor will still be there - for ocfs2 it will be major=2, minor=0 --Mark On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 04:11:32PM -0800, Rusty Lynch wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:31:49PM -0800, Manish Singh wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:59:52AM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > > Could we call it "ocfs" instead of "ocfs2" below? We will likely be bumping > > > up the version number in the header for ocfs version 2 when it's released. > > > > Yeah, call it "ocfs" and set SEC_TYPE to "ocfs1", "ocfs2", and "ntocfs" > > for version 1, version 2, and windows ocfs, respectively. For ocfs1 the > > major version is 1, ocfs2 is 2, and ntocfs it's >= 9. > > The current ocfs2 code has major=1 and minor=2... is the increase of the > major number just not done yet, or did you mean to switch off the minor? > > --rusty -- Mark Fasheh Software Developer, Oracle Corp mark.fasheh@oracle.com