From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sander Subject: Re: Last reiser4 snapshot is at: http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.02.06/ Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:30:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20040206143005.GA31096@favonius> References: <16419.38404.592630.141335@laputa.namesys.com> <20040206140319.GC30481@favonius> <16419.41118.153096.216109@laputa.namesys.com> Reply-To: sander@humilis.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16419.41118.153096.216109@laputa.namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Nikita Danilov Cc: sander@humilis.net, Reiserfs developers mail-list , Reiserfs mail-list Nikita Danilov wrote (ao): > Sander writes: > > Btw, can you please make a snapshot against the -mm tree? I think > > that would help to get it included in that tree. > > Well, making two snapshots is kind of "double trouble", because both > has to be tested and bug reports for them have to be handled. What we > can do, on the other hand, is to make a decision to switch to the -mm > series completely. But this is for Hans to decide. IMVHO, that would be a good thing. > Are you actually having any problems with applying/running snapshot on > top of -mm? Yes, but I haven't looked into them yet. This is on 2.6.2 with -mm1 applied: $ patch -p1 -s -i ../all.diff Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway? [n] n 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/Makefile.rej 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/i386/kernel/entry.S.rej 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-i386/unistd.h.rej 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ./include/asm-i386/thread_info.h.rej 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ./arch/i386/kernel/init_task.c.rej Thank you. With kind regards, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net