From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.2-rc3: irq#19 - nobody cared - with an au88xx
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 01:33:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040207063340.GA12861@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1076134307.2562.1553.camel@dhcppc4>
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 01:11:48AM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> Can you isolate this regression to a specific release? There have been
> several changes to arch/i386/kernel/irq.c since 2.6.0-test7. Also, it
> would be interesting to know if it also happens with CONFIG_SMP=n (but
> with the IOAPIC still enabled) Plus, a sanity check of the rate of
> interrutps reported by /proc/interrupts might yield a clue.
>
> thanks,
> -Len
>
> ps.
> You can avoid the symptom by booting with "noirqdebug" or having the
> interrupt handling always return IRQ_HANDLED. But then we'd lose the
> means to find out why the driver is receiving interrupts for which it
> can find no cause.
Thanks for the response, Len. If I can identify which kernel triggered
the problem I'll let you know. It will be tricky, since it takes a day
or more to appear.
For the record, I've figured out why no one ever submitted the driver:
I somehow didn't notice the binary-only module in the middle of the
rest of the code. The main interrupt handler is in there. The driver
wrapper returns IRQ_NONE if some blob of code in there decides the card
didn't generate an interrupt, so it could be anything. I see that
there's now a reverse-engineered ALSA driver for this card so I'm going
to see if that works first.
>
> On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 23:42, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I've started getting this, every 24 hours or so:
> >
> > irq 19: nobody cared!
> > Call Trace:
> > [<c010d38a>] __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0x90
> > [<c010d480>] note_interrupt+0x70/0xb0
> > [<c010d7c0>] do_IRQ+0x160/0x1a0
> > [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x60
> > [<c010b8d8>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
> > [<c0108990>] default_idle+0x0/0x40
> > [<c0105000>] _stext+0x0/0x60
> > [<c01089bc>] default_idle+0x2c/0x40
> > [<c0108a4b>] cpu_idle+0x3b/0x50
> > [<c04b64a0>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x120
> > [<c04b6926>] start_kernel+0x1a6/0x1f0
> > [<c04b64a0>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x120
> >
> > handlers:
> > [<f886b290>] (au_isr+0x0/0xb0 [au8830])
> > Disabling IRQ #19
> >
> > and then sound doesn't work for a while.
> >
> > There's a good chance this is my fault. IRQ 19 is:
> >
> > 19: 18500001 0 IO-APIC-level au88xx
> >
> > and the au88xx driver is an out-of-tree driver that was developed on
> > 2.4/early-2.5, and I ported it to 2.6 myself. It worked flawlessly on
> > 2.6.0-test7; has something changed in how interrupt handlers are
> > required to
> > behave?
> >
> > [Just ask if you actually want the source to this driver... I don't
> > know
> > enough about the card to actually submit it to Linus's tree and the
> > driver's
> > original authors aparently didn't care to.]
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Jacobowitz
> > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
>
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-07 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BF1FE1855350A0479097B3A0D2A80EE0023E89C2@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
2004-02-07 6:11 ` 2.6.2-rc3: irq#19 - nobody cared - with an au88xx Len Brown
2004-02-07 6:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-04-06 18:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-06 22:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-06 23:43 ` Joshua Kwan
2004-04-07 4:08 Brown, Len
2004-04-07 14:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-12 18:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-12 21:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-12 21:51 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-07 4:42 Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040207063340.GA12861@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.