From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267058AbUBGTFY (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:05:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267062AbUBGTFY (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:05:24 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:49327 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267058AbUBGTFS (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:05:18 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 11:07:32 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Anton Blanchard Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Manfreds patch to distribute boot allocations across nodes Message-Id: <20040207110732.4c6ced3f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040207090634.GQ19011@krispykreme> References: <20040207042559.GP19011@krispykreme> <20040206210428.17ee63db.akpm@osdl.org> <20040207090634.GQ19011@krispykreme> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Anton Blanchard wrote: > > > Should this not search for the emptiest node? > > Allocating things round robin avoids a hot node where everything ends up > being allocated. Have you any performance measurements for this patch? > > Is non-__init code allowed to call __init code? I thought that caused > > linkage errors on some setups. Pretty sure about that. I think, maybe. > > Maybe. Its news to me. I'll check.