From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265837AbUBJLkZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:40:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265841AbUBJLkZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:40:25 -0500 Received: from dsl-082-083-128-026.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.128.26]:37769 "EHLO server1.intern.kubla.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265837AbUBJLkY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:40:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:40:22 +0100 From: Dominik Kubla To: Albert Cahalan Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Albert Cahalan , linux-kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Does anyone still care about BSD ptys? Message-ID: <20040210114022.GC1229@intern.kubla.de> References: <1076334541.27234.140.camel@cube> <4027BFE7.5040100@zytor.com> <1076347137.27234.166.camel@cube> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1076347137.27234.166.camel@cube> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I should mention here that the SysV pty stuff > is nearly 100% undocumented in the man pages. > I get nothing for pts, pty, grantpt... Update your system! manpages-1.62 includes: getpt(3) grantpt(3) ptsname(3) unlockpt(3) pts(4) ptmx(4) Now that should be sufficient, shouldn't it? Regards, Dominik Kubla -- In buying horses and taking a wife shut your eyes tight and commend yourself to God.