From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] powernow-k7 acpi support. Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:08:12 +0000 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040210180812.GA12634@redhat.com> References: <20040209150519.GA6531@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040209175000.GE13262@poupinou.org> <20040209180553.GA30914@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040209182957.GF13262@poupinou.org> <20040209132659.GY13262@poupinou.org> <20040209150519.GA6531@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040209175000.GE13262@poupinou.org> <20040209180553.GA30914@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040209185831.GG13262@poupinou.org> <20040210090320.GC10662@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040210090320.GC10662@dominikbrodowski.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bruno Ducrot , cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:03:20AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:58:31PM +0100, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > > Ok, you win. That one is ok ? > > Looks good as well. All we have to decide is where to call these functions, > though... and Davej has to decide whether he likes it, too :-) Looks good to me, though I'm missing the part where you wire this up to the rest of the code. I see two possibilities. - fallback to acpi when we detect bad PST's. - module parameter to force usage of acpi (override PST) Dave