From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:28:51 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb: class isn't work conserving ?!
Message-Id: <200402111928.51189.stef.coene@docum.org>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <4027E46C.4040302@rocksteady.com>
In-Reply-To: <4027E46C.4040302@rocksteady.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

On Monday 09 February 2004 20:50, Patrick Turley wrote:
> I am seeing a lot of messages like this on my console and in
> /var/log/messages:
>
>
>    Feb  9 19:27:55 rnsa kernel: htb: class 20001 isn't work conserving ?!
>
>
> The class it's referring to is the only subclass of an HTB qdisc. Can
> anyone tell me why HTB would complain in this way? If I understand
> correctly, HTB isn't a work-conserving qdisc anyway.
I'm not sure, but htb is not a work-conserving qdisc, but the class is work=
=20
conserving.  The htb class will not delay the packet.

Stef

--=20
stef.coene@docum.org
=A0"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.docum.org/
=A0 =A0 =A0#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/