From: stevegt@TerraLuna.Org
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: GCC 3.0.4 incompatible (FAQ?)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040212035453.GI3272@pathfinder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1AqpZj-0003X9-00@wisbech.cl.cam.ac.uk>
It looks safe to say that gcc 3.0.4 is incompatible with xen and/or
xenolinux; this should probably be added to the FAQ.
I recompiled today's 1.2 with gcc 3.3.2 and that got rid of the hang at
partition check.
Steve
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:18:27AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I built xen and xenolinux from this morning's 1.2 pull and attempted to
> > boot it on the same hardware where I've been running the 02 Feb 1.2
> > build. It hangs in partition check. Compiler for both builds is gcc
> > 3.0.4. BIOS settings etc. are the same -- this node reboots back into
> > the 02 Feb build just fine.
>
> Any chance you could try with a different version of GCC? This sounds
> possibly like an unexpected optimisation by the compiler (I saw a
> problem with very similar symptoms a coupel of weeks ago that affected
> mainly early GCC 3.x compilers).
>
> Perhaps I should keep a suite of GCC installations lying around for
> local testing of this kind of bug. :-)
>
> -- Keir
>
> > Xen is running well enough that help etc. works -- here're the boot
> > messages, followed by the output of several dump queries. Let me know
> > what else you need.
> >
> > Steve
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
--
Stephen G. Traugott (KG6HDQ)
UNIX/Linux Infrastructure Architect, TerraLuna LLC
stevegt@TerraLuna.Org
http://www.stevegt.com -- http://Infrastructures.Org
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-12 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 6:52 09 Feb 1.2 hangs on partition check stevegt
2004-02-11 8:18 ` Keir Fraser
2004-02-11 11:03 ` Keir Fraser
2004-02-11 20:29 ` stevegt
2004-02-11 21:59 ` Ian Pratt
2004-02-12 3:54 ` stevegt [this message]
2004-02-11 8:38 ` Steven Hand
2004-02-11 8:42 ` Steven Hand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-12 6:59 GCC 3.0.4 incompatible (FAQ?) Jan van Rensburg
2004-02-12 7:48 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040212035453.GI3272@pathfinder \
--to=stevegt@terraluna.org \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.