From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266721AbUBMDlb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:41:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266775AbUBMDlb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:41:31 -0500 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]:31618 "EHLO mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266721AbUBMDla (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:41:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 03:41:19 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: Robert White Cc: "'Theodore Ts'o'" , "'Pavel Machek'" , "'the grugq'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH - ext2fs privacy (i.e. secure deletion) patch Message-ID: <20040213034119.GK25499@mail.shareable.org> References: <20040204062936.GA2663@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert White wrote: > On the more positive side this would be _*outstanding*_ for my NV-RAM > keychain drive where the files are warranted to be small and I don't want > some random person who finds my lost keychain even able to guess about that > pesky project I was working on last month. An encrypted and/or steganographic filesystem would be much better for your NVRAM keychain drive, because that hides your files even when you _haven't_ deleted them. -- Jamie