All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>
To: Matt Thrailkill <xwred1@modestolan.com>
Cc: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: strange performance of raid0
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:05:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040215120525.GA19434@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1076838850.28006.6.camel@stoneburner.xwredwing.net>

On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:54:11AM -0800, Matt Thrailkill wrote:
> The you don't get as good performance because hdc1 is slow enough to
> really drag it down.  Think about it, if reads are all going about
> sequentially, it has to spend alot of time waiting on that 16mb/s drive
> compared to the others.

I would have thought the disks would have worked towards gaining
performance enhancements in some cumulative way, is that not so, in theory?

So why is 3 disks slower than 2?

> You probably can't get 100mb/s with the two because that would be pretty
> efficient, and there's probably more overhead than that.
> 
> Shouldn't the 80gb drive be going faster than 16mb/s though?  Have you
> checked hdparm to make sure dma and all the goodies are turned on for
> it?

I have a 40 GB segate disk also, on the same motherboard IDE
controller, it runs about 40 MB/s. So yes, the hdc1
should go faster, and I have measured something like 40 MB/s
on it in idler times. I think it is because it is running other 
processes. The machine is a ftp mirror and the disk has RedHat
and Fedora ISO images, so it is quite popular.

> On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 02:04, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > I have some strange performance results on a raid0
> > I have 4 IDE disks on two controllers, the one on the 
> > motherboard of the duron 1 GHz mackine, the other a promise TX2 plus 
> > SATA + PATA controller. I run kernel 2.4.22
> > 
> > The disks and hdparm -t on each of them
> > 
> > /dev/hdc1 seagate 80 GB                   16 MB/s
> > /dev/sda1 maxtor sata 200 GB              50 MB/s
> > /dev/sdb7 maxtor 160 GB                   54 MB/s
> > 
> > The partitions are al about 5 GB each.
> > 
> > If I make a raid0 device of all of them I get a thruput of 45 MB/s
> > IIf I exclude the hdc1 partition, I get around 75 MB/s.
> > The system is a little loaded - but that would be normal operating
> > conditions. CPU is 90 % idle. I have about 100 MB free RAM.
> > 
> > Why is it slower with 3 disks in the raid0 than
> > 2 disks? Why don't I get approx 100 MB/s out of just the two?
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Keld
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-15 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-15 10:04 strange performance of raid0 Keld Jørn Simonsen
2004-02-15  9:54 ` Matt Thrailkill
2004-02-15 12:05   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen [this message]
2004-02-15 11:55     ` Matt Thrailkill
2004-02-15 16:48     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2004-02-15 20:35     ` Mark Hahn
2004-02-15 20:49       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2004-02-15 23:58 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2004-02-17 17:50 ` Gregory Leblanc
2004-02-17 23:26   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040215120525.GA19434@rap.rap.dk \
    --to=keld@dkuug.dk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xwred1@modestolan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.