From: Chip Salzenberg <chip@pobox.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.3-rc3 - IDE DMA errors on Thinkpad A30
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 23:08:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040216040811.GF3789@perlsupport.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40303D59.4030605@pobox.com>
According to Jeff Garzik:
> Other equally smart people argue that modern IDE disks reserve space for
> remapping bad sectors. If you run out of sectors that the drive is
> willing to silently remap for you, you should toss the disk and buy a
> new one.
OK, I get the theory. But AFAICT this drive hasn't remapped *any*
sectors. Yet. (Which would not be impossible; it's a relatively
new drive, a few months old at most.) Quoting smartctl:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 050 Pre-fail Always - 0
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 3
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 100 100 000 Old_age Offline - 0
This seems to suggest that there are three *candidate* sectors with
reallocation pending, none of which have actually been remapped (yet).
If so, drive replacement would perhaps be premature.
I suppose it's time to read up on the details of the SMART spec.
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <chip@pobox.com>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-16 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1pliv-6ya-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-15 15:22 ` Linux 2.6.3-rc3 - missing IDE hunk from bk4; good or bad? Chip Salzenberg
2004-02-15 15:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-15 16:34 ` Linux 2.6.3-rc3 - IDE DMA errors on Thinkpad A30 Chip Salzenberg
2004-02-15 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-16 0:55 ` Chip Salzenberg
2004-02-16 2:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 3:37 ` Chip Salzenberg
2004-02-16 3:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 3:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-16 4:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 4:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-16 12:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-16 4:08 ` Chip Salzenberg [this message]
2004-02-16 4:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-16 19:27 ` Eric D. Mudama
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040216040811.GF3789@perlsupport.com \
--to=chip@pobox.com \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.