From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stevegt@TerraLuna.Org Subject: Re: Network interface problem Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:32:40 -0800 Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040217053240.GW3272@pathfinder> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Keir Fraser Cc: "Tvrtko A. Ur?ulin" , xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 01:54:56PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: > Also, the Linux developers recommend using GCC 2.95.3 for maximum > stability. This is therefore probably a good choice for Xen as well, > although all our testing uses 3.3.2 as shipped with Redhat 9. I had to stop using 2.95.4 for Xen a few weeks ago, and 3.0.4 last week. In both cases, they built fine but had runtime errors ranging from incomplete boot to intermittent instability. I'm using 3.3.2 on Debian testing (sarge) right now and it seems to work well -- several guests running on a few hosts since the middle of last week, some in production. I'm not sure any gcc < 3.2 is safe for Xen right now. Steve -- Stephen G. Traugott (KG6HDQ) UNIX/Linux Infrastructure Architect, TerraLuna LLC stevegt@TerraLuna.Org http://www.stevegt.com -- http://Infrastructures.Org ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click