From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tvrtko A. =?iso-8859-2?q?Ur=B9ulin?=" Subject: Re: Support for privileged operations? Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:54:34 +0100 Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200402171454.34056.tvrtko@croadria.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tuesday 17 February 2004 14:41, Keir Fraser wrote: > We haven't had time to test many different Xenolinux config > arrangements. We'll happily accept patches to fix this kind of > problem! I will be more than glad to help but unfortunately I cannot do much in the following week or two (must deploy several critical production servers). From the same reason my Xen testing will calm down a little :) Also, I can confirm that P4 is a safe CPU config option when building 100% monolith XenoLinux while QoS seems to have strange effects. Only thing left to be tested is interaction of the afore mentioned when building modular kernel. Then I will have definitive answers about problematic/safe options. I suspect that mmu update panic is somehow related to modular kernel. > Note also that you *don't* have to disable 'privileged Xenolinux' to > be able to safely run domains other than zero. Xen enforces this for > you -- the privilged parts of a non-zero domain are essentially > useless. Sure, I just wanted to optimize the size of the guest image :) ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click