All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Hicks <mort@wildopensource.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce TLB flushing during process migration
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:01:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040217220154.GT12142@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040217125038.14396a1d.akpm@osdl.org>



On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:50:38PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Martin Hicks <mort@wildopensource.com> wrote:
> >
> > Another optimization patch from Jack Steiner, intended to reduce TLB
> > flushes during process migration.
> 
> This patch is only applicable to CONFIG_NUMA.  Wouldn't SMP systems benefit
> from the same treatment?
> 
> And does this optimisation come with any benchmark results?

Here's some figures from Jack:

---

I dont have a benchmark for JUST the scheduler change, but the entire
node history + sched change is:

        nwchem on a 128p showed:

          Before:
            siosi7.sale.56-shm1cs: Time after atomic energies summed:   140.2
            siosi7.sale.120-shm1cs: Time after atomic energies summed:   306.9

          After:
            56p  = Time after atomic energies summed:    99.3
            120p = Time after atomic energies summed:   110.4

          Almost 3X improvement on 120p.

I dont recall how much was due to the sched fix, but I remember that it was
significant.

Note that the amount of improvement is highly platform specific.


---

mh

-- 
Martin Hicks                Wild Open Source Inc.
mort@wildopensource.com     613-266-2296

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-17 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-17 15:49 [PATCH] Reduce TLB flushing during process migration Martin Hicks
2004-02-17 18:07 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-17 20:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-17 22:01   ` Martin Hicks [this message]
2004-02-18  2:34 ` Rusty Russell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-17 16:22 Manfred Spraul
2004-02-17 18:08 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-17 20:05   ` Martin Hicks
2004-02-17 20:08     ` David S. Miller
2004-02-17 20:37       ` Martin Hicks
2004-05-22 12:11 Jack Steiner
2004-05-25  5:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-25 13:45 ` Jack Steiner
2004-06-01 15:59 ` Jack Steiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040217220154.GT12142@localhost \
    --to=mort@wildopensource.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.