All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carsten Otte <cotte@freenet.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, cotte@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3 [linux-2.6.2.]: accessing already freed inodes when under memory pressure
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:19:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402192119.57078.cotte@freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402190850270.1222@ppc970.osdl.org>

Am Donnerstag 19 Februar 2004 17:53 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> I really think this is wrong. The bug is clearly in ext3 reference count
> handling, and I'd much rather just have ext3 fix its reference count than
> add a totally new interface for ext3 breakage.
I do agree that the final patch fixing the problem should not add a new 
interface. This one clearly should not go into vanilla, but consider adding 
the BUG_ON statement at least for the time being until there is a real fix.
diff -ruN linux-2.6.2/fs/ext3/super.c 
linux-2.6.2+bug_statement/fs/ext3/super.c
--- linux-2.6.2/fs/ext3/super.c 2004-02-19 12:52:01.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.2+bug_statement/fs/ext3/super.c   2004-02-19 12:51:35.000000000 
+0100
@@ -449,6 +449,7 @@
 
 static void ext3_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
+       BUG_ON (!list_empty(&EXT3_I(inode)->i_orphan));
        kmem_cache_free(ext3_inode_cachep, EXT3_I(inode));
 }
 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-19 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-19 12:21 [PATCH] ext3 [linux-2.6.2.]: accessing already freed inodes when under memory pressure Carsten Otte
2004-02-19 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 17:39   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-02-19 18:49     ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 20:28       ` Carsten Otte
2004-02-19 20:26         ` viro
2004-02-19 20:35           ` Carsten Otte
2004-02-19 20:14     ` Carsten Otte
2004-02-20  3:41       ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 20:19   ` Carsten Otte [this message]
     [not found] ` <20040220164325.659c4e45.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]   ` <200402241338.57855.cotte@freenet.de>
2004-02-24 22:55     ` Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-19 18:00 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-03-29 19:07 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-03-29 20:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-03-29 20:29   ` Dave Kleikamp
2004-03-30 11:57 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-03-30 13:39 ` David Woodhouse
2004-03-30 14:16   ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-03-30 15:51   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 16:12     ` viro
2004-04-02 18:01       ` viro
2004-04-02 18:52         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 19:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 19:10             ` viro
2004-04-02 19:07           ` viro
2004-04-02 20:23             ` viro
2004-04-02 22:40               ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-02 23:06                 ` viro
2004-04-02 23:23                   ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-03  0:53                     ` Neil Brown
2004-04-02 23:19                 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-02 19:17           ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 19:25             ` viro
2004-04-02 19:32             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 19:37               ` viro
2004-04-02 19:45                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 20:08                   ` viro
2004-04-02 20:40               ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 20:59                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-02 21:09                   ` viro
2004-04-02 23:42                   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 21:08                 ` viro
2004-04-03  0:39                   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-05 14:07                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-03-30 15:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 16:14   ` viro
2004-03-30 15:13 Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200402192119.57078.cotte@freenet.de \
    --to=cotte@freenet.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.