From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: possible to mask nodes from being created ?
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 03:23:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402202223.48677.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200402191452.14645.vapier@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 332 bytes --]
On Friday 20 February 2004 07:53 pm, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I just changed to kernel includes to make fewer devices....
> > Yes there is. Just make a rule that matches the devices that you do not
> > want to have created and do not specify a NAME field (or give it a empty
> > string.)
ah both will work just fine, thanks guys
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-21 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-19 19:52 possible to mask nodes from being created ? Mike Frysinger
2004-02-21 0:35 ` Greg KH
2004-02-21 0:53 ` Jon Smirl
2004-02-21 3:23 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402202223.48677.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.