From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261887AbUBWJGr (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 04:06:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261890AbUBWJGr (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 04:06:47 -0500 Received: from relay.dada.it ([195.110.100.8]:54403 "EHLO relay.dada.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261887AbUBWJGo (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 04:06:44 -0500 From: Fabio Coatti Organization: FerraraLUG To: Len Brown Subject: Re: 2.6.3-mm1 and aic7xxx Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:06:38 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1077521296.12675.81.camel@dhcppc4> In-Reply-To: <1077521296.12675.81.camel@dhcppc4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402231006.38085.cova@ferrara.linux.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alle Monday 23 February 2004 08:28, Len Brown ha scritto: > > Fabio, > Any chance you can isolate further where this broke by finding the > latest release where it worked properly? > > ie. does vanilla 2.6.3 work if you back out the mm patch? > > If 2.6.3 works, then I'd be interested if the following 2.6.3 patch > breaks it: [SNIP] Sure, this evening I'll try to catch the exact last release that worked fine. I've used only mm releases so far, so I've noticed the problem only with 2.6.3-mm1 and mm2; in a few hours I'll report back for other versions as you suggested. -- Fabio Coatti http://www.ferrara.linux.it/members/cova Ferrara Linux Users Group http://ferrara.linux.it GnuPG fp:9765 A5B6 6843 17BC A646 BE8C FA56 373A 5374 C703 Old SysOps never die... they simply forget their password.