From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:56:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040223185641.A12585@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040223170336.GK5499@fs.tum.de>; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:03:36PM +0100
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:03:36PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> In the long term, x86_64 creates more confusion:
> - SuSE says AMD64 [1]
> - RedHat says AMD64 [2]
Not the rpm architecture, though :)
Maybe they also say IPF for ia64?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-23 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-18 1:44 Intel vs AMD x86-64 Linus Torvalds
2004-02-18 9:56 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-02-18 14:31 ` Diego Calleja García
2004-02-18 18:17 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2004-02-18 14:54 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-02-18 15:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-22 2:59 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 3:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-22 3:39 ` Tomasz Rola
2004-02-22 3:47 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22 4:12 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-02-23 0:38 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-23 2:17 ` Tom Vier
2004-02-22 8:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-02-22 10:00 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-02-23 15:51 ` Clay Haapala
2004-02-23 17:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-02-23 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-24 9:47 ` Kees Bakker
2004-02-24 9:59 ` viro
2004-02-24 10:59 ` Andrew Walrond
2004-02-23 18:56 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-02-23 21:25 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-23 21:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-23 21:48 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-23 22:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-23 22:06 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-23 22:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-24 1:01 ` Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-02-24 1:11 ` John Heil
2004-02-24 13:32 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-24 14:39 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-02-24 19:43 ` Rogier Wolff
2004-02-24 19:49 ` John Heil
2004-02-24 20:03 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-24 20:03 ` John Heil
2004-02-24 21:20 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-25 18:40 ` Matt Seitz
2004-02-18 19:13 ` Aaron Lehmann
2004-02-19 6:02 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-02-19 9:15 ` Terje Eggestad
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-18 21:26 Peter Maas
2004-02-18 21:28 Peter Maas
2004-02-23 18:10 Nakajima, Jun
2004-02-24 13:25 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-23 19:59 Xose Vazquez Perez
2004-02-24 2:42 Albert Cahalan
2004-02-24 16:44 ` Dave Jones
2004-02-24 15:11 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-02-24 17:34 ` Dave Jones
2004-02-24 15:29 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-02-24 18:07 ` Dave Jones
2004-02-24 21:01 Sean Fao
2004-02-24 21:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-24 22:21 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-25 22:30 ` Davide Rossetti
2004-02-24 21:31 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-24 21:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-24 21:28 ` Dave Jones
2004-02-26 21:39 ` Kai Henningsen
2004-02-24 23:15 Nakajima, Jun
2004-02-25 1:52 ` Chris Wedgwood
[not found] <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D37200173EA2684@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-24 23:49 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-25 3:07 Nakajima, Jun
2004-02-25 3:24 Nakajima, Jun
2004-02-25 16:22 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-25 16:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-25 17:18 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-25 17:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-25 19:05 ` Timothy Miller
[not found] <1sRYA-1uZ-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1sSi2-1NC-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1sT4l-2CW-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-25 15:41 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-25 16:08 ` Moritz Muehlenhoff
2004-02-25 20:07 Nakajima, Jun
2004-02-25 23:44 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-26 0:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-26 1:19 Nakajima, Jun
2004-02-26 16:04 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-27 3:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-03-02 23:22 Nakajima, Jun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040223185641.A12585@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.