From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibmvscsi driver - next version Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:08:42 +0000 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040223210842.A14093@infradead.org> References: <20040223144542.A9624@infradead.org> <403A6822.2040700@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:64528 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262049AbUBWVIp (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:08:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <403A6822.2040700@us.ibm.com>; from brking@us.ibm.com on Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:52:50PM -0600 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Brian King Cc: Dave Boutcher , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:52:50PM -0600, Brian King wrote: > I'm not sure I agree with this statement. Looking at scsi_error.c, it looks > to me like there is a race condition in that the midlayer decides whether or > not to abort an op, then grabs the host lock, then calls eh_abort. From the > time that the midlayer decides to abort an op and then grabs the host lock, the > op may have finished. Could ypu please submit a patch to fix it? I wish people would just send patches directly if they encounter problem..