From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262078AbUBWXcO (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:32:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262089AbUBWXcO (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:32:14 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:34007 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262078AbUBWXcN (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:32:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:29:28 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Andrew Morton Cc: Manfred Spraul , torvalds@osdl.org, piggin@cyberone.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix shmat Message-ID: <20040223232928.GY5801@krispykreme> References: <20040223125730.18a8ed5d.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040223125730.18a8ed5d.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I'd be inclined to leave it as sys_shmat(). It is logically a syscall, and > the fact that everyone except mips (and ia64) sticks a multiplexer in front > of it is a sad historical note. I still live in hope that we break it back out into syscalls on ppc32/64 one day. Anton