From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262369AbUBXSZk (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:25:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262382AbUBXSYR (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:24:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:10218 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262394AbUBXSWQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:22:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:22:08 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: Ron Peterson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: network / performance problems Message-Id: <20040224102208.4fd285e3.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org So Ron, as performance gets worse and worse, take a look at what the firewall rules in the kernel look like. I bet you're accumulating netfilter ipchains rules over time and this makes packet processing go slower and slower, and it's due to some bug in whatever is dynamically adding firewall rules to your system. I'm guessing all of this because that is exactly what was causing problems for someone who reported something basically identical to what you're reporting now the other week.