From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: FWD: [BK PATCH] SCSI host num allocation improvement
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:39:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040227163914.GO4019@phunnypharm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1077899833.2157.82.camel@mulgrave>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:37:13AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 09:32, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On the same token, if you hot plug/unplug a single device (not a host)
> > on the same host, you will already have this problem. This wont make the
> > problem any worse or better. Devices are more likely to get
> > plugged/unplugged anyway (well, in the case of usb/firewire you
> > plug/unplug a host/dev combination, but still).
>
> Simply having races is not an excuse for introducing more, particularly
> when they're under our control.
>
> This represents a behaviour change in a stable kernel introducing a
> potential problem in hotplug and solving a fixable issue in a single
> user application tool.
>
> What I'm not yet convinced of is that the benefits outweigh the risks.
The problems you keep raising already exist and aren't going to be
increased by this patch.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-27 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-27 0:40 FWD: [BK PATCH] SCSI host num allocation improvement James Bottomley
2004-02-27 0:56 ` Matthew Dharm
2004-02-27 1:04 ` Ben Collins
2004-02-27 7:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-27 12:30 ` Ben Collins
2004-02-27 12:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-02-27 12:43 ` Ben Collins
2004-02-27 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-27 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-27 13:04 ` Ben Collins
2004-02-27 16:49 ` Mike Anderson
2004-02-27 17:00 ` Ben Collins
2004-02-27 21:26 ` Mike Anderson
2004-02-27 15:08 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-27 15:15 ` Ben Collins
2004-02-27 15:29 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-27 15:32 ` Ben Collins
2004-02-27 16:37 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-27 16:39 ` Ben Collins [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-27 13:25 David.Egolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040227163914.GO4019@phunnypharm.org \
--to=bcollins@debian.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.