From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262931AbUB0SrZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:47:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262933AbUB0Sqa (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:46:30 -0500 Received: from delerium.kernelslacker.org ([81.187.208.145]:43706 "EHLO delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262934AbUB0Sno (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:43:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:42:23 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Sysfs is too restrictive Message-ID: <20040227184223.GB9352@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040227100541.284fb155@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040227181454.GD15016@redhat.com> <20040227103003.4832cbf0@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040227103003.4832cbf0@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:30:03AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Shouldn't you be seeing the other side of the bridge in here too ? > > Ie, if br0 is a bridge between eth0 and eth1, how does that fit > > your plan ? > > yes, there would be multiple interfaces in the port directory. > More like this: Ok, that makes more sense. Dave