From: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com>
To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SHMLBA and compat tasks
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:41:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040228014128.GA6897@intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1102 bytes --]
The current Linux implementation of shmat() insists on SHMLBA alignment
even when shmflg & SHM_RND == 0. This is not consistent with the man pages
and the single UNIX spec, which require only a page-aligned address.
man page:
> If shmaddr isn’t NULL and SHM_RND is asserted in shmflg, the attach
> occurs at the address equal to shmaddr rounded down to the nearest mul-
> tiple of SHMLBA. Otherwise shmaddr must be a page-aligned address at
> which the attach occurs.
This is not a problem for many platforms because SHMLBA == PAGE_SIZE. It's
also not a problem for 64 bit programs running on 64 bit platforms,
because arch_get_unmapped_area() typically guarantees SHMLBA alignment,
even when SHM_RND is not asserted.
However, for 32 bit compatiblity programs, an innocuous sequence such as:
p = shmat(id, 0, shmflg) /* shmflag & SHM_RND == 0 */
/* p is page-aligned, but may not be SHMLBA aligned */
shmdt(p)
shmat(id, p, shmflg) == -EINVAL ??
can fail. The attached patch fixes the problem for ia64. Can other arch
maintainers confirm that it doesn't break anything for you ?
-Arun
[-- Attachment #2: shmat.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 339 bytes --]
--- linux/ipc/shm.c.orig 2003-04-28 11:19:24.000000000 -0700
+++ linux/ipc/shm.c 2003-05-09 13:26:13.000000000 -0700
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@
if (addr & (SHMLBA-1)) {
if (shmflg & SHM_RND)
addr &= ~(SHMLBA-1); /* round down */
- else
+ else if (addr & ~PAGE_MASK)
return -EINVAL;
}
flags = MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED;
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-28 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-28 1:41 Arun Sharma [this message]
2004-02-28 23:55 ` SHMLBA and compat tasks David S. Miller
2004-02-29 2:11 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-01 5:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-01 19:33 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-01 19:41 ` David Mosberger
2004-03-01 20:11 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-01 20:17 ` David Mosberger
2004-03-01 20:16 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-01 20:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-03-02 19:43 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-06 2:37 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-06 7:39 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040228014128.GA6897@intel.com \
--to=arun.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.