From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched domains kernbench improvements
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:59:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402282159.58452.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
Hi Nick
> So it is more a matter of tuning than anything fundamental
Geez I know how you feel... :-D
I tried it on the X440 with sched smt disabled
better than before but still slower than vanilla on half load; however better
than vanilla on optimal and full load now! I wonder whether the worse result
on half load is as relevant since this is 8x HT cpus?
Full details:
vanilla:
Average Half Load Run:
Elapsed Time 120.186
User Time 800.614
System Time 92.604
Percent CPU 742.4
Context Switches 10430.6
Sleeps 26554.6
Average Optimum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 81.67
User Time 1009.54
System Time 113.614
Percent CPU 1374.6
Context Switches 63728
Sleeps 41399.4
Average Maximum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 83.148
User Time 1014.54
System Time 123.806
Percent CPU 1368.4
Context Switches 45229.6
Sleeps 22077.6
-mm no SMT (sorry didnt do max load):
Average Half Load Run:
Elapsed Time 133.51
User Time 799.268
System Time 92.784
Percent CPU 669
Context Switches 19340.8
Sleeps 24427.4
Average Optimum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 81.486
User Time 1006.37
System Time 106.952
Percent CPU 1366.8
Context Switches 33939
Sleeps 32453.4
-mm less idle:
Average Half Load Run:
Elapsed Time 128.23
User Time 819.256
System Time 93.09
Percent CPU 713
Context Switches 18566.2
Sleeps 24663.8
Average Optimum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 79.844
User Time 1004.26
System Time 106.74
Percent CPU 1391.8
Context Switches 33718
Sleeps 33007.8
Average Maximum Load Run:
Elapsed Time 81.47
User Time 1008.32
System Time 119.652
Percent CPU 1384.4
Context Switches 31296.6
Sleeps 22667.6
Con
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-28 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-28 10:59 Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-02-28 11:15 ` sched domains kernbench improvements Nick Piggin
2004-02-28 11:18 ` Con Kolivas
2004-02-28 11:23 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-28 12:27 ` Con Kolivas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-28 9:21 Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402282159.58452.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.