From: Manish Singh <manish.singh@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] Updated Patch for 2.6 Make system
Date: Wed Mar 3 17:15:13 2004 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040303231509.GD22645@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D19C3AC815734C9E19FE4C4F6128A6178046@orsmsx403.jf.intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:54:23AM -0800, Villalovos, John L wrote:
> > > Makes sense. Though would it make sense to distribute your
> > generated
> > > configure script in the future? I thought the purpose of
> > configure was
> > > that you could use it to create a configure script that is
> > distributed
> > > in the tarball and the people don't need to have autoconf
> > on their end.
> > > This way we wouldn't have to worry about which version of
> > autoconf is on
> > > a system.
> >
> > That's true for released tarballs, but not for svn checkouts. It's not
> > really proper to have generated files in source control,
> > since different
> > installations can produce different output, which leads to
> > merge confusion.
>
> I agree but you should NOT have to support older versions of autoconf
> because when you generate the tarball you will create the configure
> script for them.
That's what I meant with "That's true for released tarballs".
> But if the goal is to support AS 2.1 in the mode where they can check
> the code out and run autoconf then you would need to support the older
> versions. And I suppose if you are doing your development on AS 2.1
> then you would probably want that.
That's precisely the goal.
-Manish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-03 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-03 10:57 [Ocfs2-devel] Updated Patch for 2.6 Make system Villalovos, John L
2004-03-03 17:15 ` Manish Singh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-02 18:01 Villalovos, John L
2004-03-02 19:51 ` Manish Singh
2004-03-02 16:29 John L. Villalovos
2004-03-02 17:47 ` Manish Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040303231509.GD22645@ca-server1.us.oracle.com \
--to=manish.singh@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.