From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.30) id 1B1F28-0002GI-C8 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:30:48 -0500 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1AzwXL-00055y-Le for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 06:33:39 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1AzwWn-00051u-Am for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 06:33:36 -0500 Received: from [213.228.0.176] (helo=postfix4-2.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AzwWm-00051k-IC for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 06:33:04 -0500 Received: from openbrick.enbug.org (boitelle-1-82-66-127-114.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.127.114]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97CB80EAF for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 12:32:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by openbrick.enbug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F244177500 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:33:02 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: FSF To: grub-devel@gnu.org Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 12:35:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403071235.50356.okuji@gnu.org> Subject: from pupa to grub or grub2 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 11:33:41 -0000 Now this list is functional. There seems to be some trouble in the GNU mail server, though. I started to replace pupa with grub or grub2. It still contains PUPA in many places, but I'd like to remove all PUPA names from GRUB 2, so that the user wouldn't be confused with the mixture of project names. But I have one question: Which is better, GRUB 2 or GRUB? Since the code base is quite different, I think the distinction between GRUB and GRUB 2 is a good thing, although I prefer GRUB to GRUB 2 as a software name. For now, I call it sometimes GRUB 2, and sometimes just GRUB. IMO, it is better to have a good guideline which specifies which name should be used in a given situation. Do you have any idea? Okuji