From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] MAINTAINERS: remove LAN media entry
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:32:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040307163245.GO22479@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040307162523.GA2440@mars.ravnborg.org>
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:25:23PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 04:51:47PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:57:11AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> > > On Feb 27, 2004, at 9:54 pm, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > >IOW:
> > > >The entry from MAINTAINER can be removed?
> > >
> > > This one for sure. The same is probably sensible for the
> > > drivers, too. It's just too confusing to not several
> > > versions of the driver floating around which need different
> > > tools. And since the manufacturer propagates their own
> > > version, the linux one should go...
> > >...
> >
> >
> > It's a question whether removing drivers from a stable kernel series is
> > a good idea, but the following is definitely correct:
>
> Why do you remove it completely, instead of just marking it unmaintained,
> and remove the address information?
> They when searching you know the you have found the right entry, but
> unfortunately it is unmaintained.
In 2.6.4-rc1-mm2, there's exactly one entry marked "Unmaintained"
(PCMCIA SUBSYSTEM) and there are very few marked "Orphan".
I don't have a strong opinion on this, but my impresion was that usually
unmaintained device drivers are not listed in MAINTAINERS.
> Sam
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-07 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-26 22:51 What happened to LAN Media Corporation? Adrian Bunk
2004-02-26 22:56 ` Dave Jones
2004-02-27 20:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-02-27 1:38 ` Daniel Egger
2004-02-27 20:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-02-28 10:57 ` Daniel Egger
2004-03-07 15:50 ` [2.4 patch] MAINTAINERS: remove LAN media entry Adrian Bunk
2004-03-08 5:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-03-08 6:04 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2004-03-08 7:16 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-03-08 9:12 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2004-03-08 12:54 ` Horst von Brand
2004-03-11 22:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-03-07 15:51 ` [2.6 " Adrian Bunk
2004-03-07 16:25 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-03-07 16:32 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2004-03-07 18:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-03-07 16:54 ` Daniel Egger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040307163245.GO22479@fs.tum.de \
--to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=degger@fhm.edu \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.