From: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, george@mvista.com, pavel@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3]
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:02:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403082202.12822.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040308152214.GE15065@smtp.west.cox.net>
On Monday 08 Mar 2004 8:52 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 04:50:18PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > On Monday 08 Mar 2004 4:37 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > If you consider it an absolutely must, we can do something so that
> > > > the dirty part is kept away and info threads almost always works.
> > >
> > > Yes, I'd consider `info threads' support a must-have. I'm rather
> > > surprised that others do not?
> >
> > Present threads support code changes calling convention of do_IRQ. Most
> > believe that to be an absolute no.
>
> I believe that George's version does something totally different, with
> some macros at compile time (and binutils support, I _think_) to not
> have to change do_IRQ.
OOPS! Present code doesn't change calling convention of do_IRQ. I changed that
some time ago.
-Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-08 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-08 9:39 kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3] Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 9:54 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 10:15 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 10:49 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 11:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 11:20 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 11:44 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 11:54 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 12:00 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 15:19 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-08 22:26 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-09 8:58 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-08 22:19 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-09 5:08 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-09 15:37 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-08 11:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-08 22:21 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-08 15:22 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-08 16:32 ` Amit S. Kale [this message]
2004-03-08 22:29 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-08 22:15 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-09 4:46 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-09 9:29 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-09 9:32 ` i386-lite [patch 2/3] [Re: kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3]] Amit S. Kale
2004-03-09 15:06 ` kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3] Tom Rini
2004-03-10 4:05 ` Amit S. Kale
[not found] <1xpyM-2Op-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1xqXN-44F-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1xr7w-4c4-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1xrqW-4rh-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1xuS8-83Q-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-08 16:57 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-08 17:18 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-09 4:29 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-09 4:36 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-10 12:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-10 15:27 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-11 4:57 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-03-11 5:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-03-11 5:11 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403082202.12822.amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--to=amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.