From: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: pci_set_dma_mask()/pci_dma_supported() & broken PCI bridge issue
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:41:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040309044138.GA9491@plexity.net> (raw)
I am a bit confused about the proper way that dma_set_mask() should
behave. My situation is that I have an ARM core that has broken
PCI window, allowing DMA only to/from the lower 64MB of RAM. My
current approach to get around this is custom dma-API functions
that trap based on (dev->bus == &pci_bus_type && *dev->dma_mask !=
0xfffffff). If dma_mask is 0xfffffff, I use the generic ARM dma API
implementation, otherwise I call my platform-specific functions
that bounce buffers that are > 64MB. I set the dma_mask to (64MB - 1)
by hooking in a platform_notify() function and calling dma_set_mask()
if the device is a PCI device.
Everything was working fine with PCI IDE, EEPro100, and USB, but
when I tried switching to Intel's e100 driver, the self test failed.
Looking at the code, the cuplrit is the following line:
if((err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, 0xFFFFFFFFULL))) {
DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "No usable DMA configuration, aborting.\n");
goto err_out_free_res;
}
pci_set_dma_mask does:
int
pci_set_dma_mask(struct pci_dev *dev, u64 mask)
{
if (!pci_dma_supported(dev, mask))
return -EIO;
dev->dma_mask = mask;
return 0;
}
Currently pci_dma_supported() on ARM returns 1 on 0xffffffff, so
the device's dma_mask gets updated and my code is no longer
trapping the calls to the DMA API, so the self-test buffer
is getting allocated outside of the DMA-safe window and it
never gets updated by the device's write (A PCI analyzer confirms
this is the case). I can fix pci_dma_supported() to return 0
on my platform if (dma_mask > 64MB), but this still leaves me
with an unusable driver b/c it will just bail out.
My comment from this experience is that it seems that there needs to
be a way for the platform code to tell the PCI layer "this dma mask you
gave me is not supported, but here is what I can support" and the driver
can decide if this is appropriate. The other option is to have the driver
keep on trying smaller and smaller masks as Documentation/dma-mapping.txt
describes.
Perhaps a pci_get_dma_mask() so that drivers can see what
the current mask is set to? In that case, drivers could do:
unsigned long long my_mask = 0x00ffffffULL;
if(pci_get_dma_mask(pdev) > my_mask) {
if(!pci_set_dma_mask(my_mask)) {
bail_out;
}
...
} else {
/* We're OK on this platform */
...
}
Comments?
~Deepak
--
Deepak Saxena - dsaxena at plexity dot net - http://www.plexity.net/
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-09 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-09 4:41 Deepak Saxena [this message]
2004-03-09 4:55 ` pci_set_dma_mask()/pci_dma_supported() & broken PCI bridge issue Deepak Saxena
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040309044138.GA9491@plexity.net \
--to=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.