From: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Charles Lever <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: NSM lock recovery fails too often
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:59:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040309155927.GL14419@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1078847262.4067.7.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:47:42AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> P=E5 ty , 09/03/2004 klokka 10:10, skreiv Olaf Kirch:
> > What I was referring to was the ability to have several RPC programs =
on a
> > single svc_sock server side; e.g. NFS and NFSACL, or NLM and NSM. Pre=
tty
> > much the way svc_register from the good ole sunrpc code works.
>=20
> Oh, sorry...
>=20
> Hmm... Any reason why you couldn't put them all on port 2049 with this
> patch? Would that be less efficient than having two sets of threads?
No, you could put all of them on the same port. The problem is that
you want lockd and nfsd to be two different processes, so you can
shut down nfsd without disrupting lockd.
Olaf
--=20
Olaf Kirch | Stop wasting entropy - start using predictable
okir@suse.de | tempfile names today!
---------------+=20
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-09 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-09 14:15 NSM lock recovery fails too often Lever, Charles
2004-03-09 14:22 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-03-09 15:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-03-09 15:10 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-03-09 15:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-03-09 15:59 ` Olaf Kirch [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-12 16:47 Lever, Charles
2004-03-09 4:30 Lever, Charles
2004-03-09 10:56 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-03-09 10:57 ` Olaf Kirch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040309155927.GL14419@suse.de \
--to=okir@suse.de \
--cc=Charles.Lever@netapp.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.