[PATCH] "symlink only" test

[Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 128 bytes --]

Here is a test for the "symlink only" rule.

Any reason to do the apply_format() inside the loop?
I've changed it.

thanks,
Kay

[-- Attachment #2: 03-symlink-only-cleanup.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1683 bytes --]

===== namedev.c 1.129 vs edited =====
--- 1.129/namedev.c	Thu Mar 11 01:15:25 2004
+++ edited/namedev.c	Thu Mar 11 01:23:01 2004
@@ -815,16 +815,11 @@
 			}
 
 			if (dev->symlink[0] != '\0') {
-				char temp[NAME_MAX];
-
 				info("configured rule in '%s' at line %i applied, added symlink '%s'",
 				     dev->config_file, dev->config_line, dev->symlink);
-				/* do not clobber dev */
-				strfieldcpy(temp, dev->symlink);
-				apply_format(udev, temp, sizeof(temp),
-					     class_dev, sysfs_device);
-				strfieldcat(udev->symlink, temp);
-				strfieldcat(udev->symlink, " ");
+				if (udev->symlink[0] != '\0')
+					strfieldcat(udev->symlink, " ");
+				strfieldcat(udev->symlink, dev->symlink);
 			}
 
 			if (dev->name[0] != '\0') {
@@ -841,8 +836,8 @@
 	goto done;
 
 found:
-	apply_format(udev, udev->name, sizeof(udev->name),
-		     class_dev, sysfs_device);
+	apply_format(udev, udev->name, sizeof(udev->name), class_dev, sysfs_device);
+	apply_format(udev, udev->symlink, sizeof(udev->symlink), class_dev, sysfs_device);
 	udev->partitions = dev->partitions;
 
 done:
===== test/udev-test.pl 1.44 vs edited =====
--- 1.44/test/udev-test.pl	Thu Mar 11 01:15:25 2004
+++ edited/test/udev-test.pl	Thu Mar 11 01:27:54 2004
@@ -513,6 +513,17 @@
 BUS="scsi", SYSFS{whitespace_test}="WHITE  SPACE   ", NAME="matched-with-space"
 EOF
 	},
+	{
+		desc     => "SYMLINK only rule",
+		subsys   => "block",
+		devpath  => "block/sda",
+		expected => "symlink-only2",
+		conf     => <<EOF
+BUS="scsi", KERNEL="sda", SYMLINK="symlink-only1"
+BUS="scsi", KERNEL="sda", SYMLINK="symlink-only2"
+BUS="scsi", KERNEL="sda", NAME="link", SYMLINK="symlink0"
+EOF
+	},
 );
 
 # set env