From: Dirk Roloff <roloff@domain.hid>
To: adeos-main@gna.org
Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] 260 uSec latency and no idea why
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:22:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403120422.44317.roloff@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4050B841.9030902@domain.hid>
Am Donnerstag, 11. März 2004 20:04 schrieb Paolo Mantegazza:
Hi Paolo,
> Dirk Roloff wrote:
> Have you tried using rt_get_cpu_time_ns to avoid mixing up with Linux
> stuff?
No i don't because i am not using rtai. I "just" use an adeos patched kernel.
But i changed the do_gettimeofday() by a rdtsc call. I dont want to know the time,
just the time elapsed. So i dont need the time calculation done by do_gettimeofday()
and i avoid mixing stuff. But the results are the same. :-(
>Have you checkd the interrupt level acknolwdge jitter/latency using
> the calibration tool available in RTAI?
again - no rtai
> Can you change your code so that it can be used anywhere? In such a case
> it would be simple to run it on a safe machine (e.g. mine) and see if it
> can be repeated, or is machine specific (yours).
Yes but it will not help a lot. I can't see such a latency on other machines.
f.e. on my Box here at home 7-17 MicroSec in the adeos domain.
And i try stressing the Box- but its a complete different h/ware.
So it must be the celeron box or some kernel/compiler settings on it.
But what is able to delay the delivery of an interrupt if there is no one
calling cli or masking irq's (Both is prohibited by adeos isn't it ?)
One thing would be waking a suspended cpu - but i disabled APM.
Someone told me Intel SpeedStep switching the mode will take hundrets of MicroSecs
but i didn't find what this is yet. Have to google some more.
Dirk.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-12 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-11 2:26 [Adeos-main] 260 uSec latency and no idea why Dirk Roloff
2004-03-11 19:04 ` Paolo Mantegazza
2004-03-12 3:22 ` Dirk Roloff [this message]
2004-03-12 7:44 ` Der Herr Hofrat
2004-03-12 17:14 ` Dirk Roloff
2004-03-12 19:32 ` Paolo Mantegazza
2004-03-12 9:52 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2004-03-12 10:08 ` Der Herr Hofrat
2004-03-12 17:15 ` Dirk Roloff
2004-03-12 18:45 ` Paolo Mantegazza
2004-03-12 23:00 ` Dirk Roloff
2004-03-15 8:53 ` Vitor Angelo
2004-03-18 13:11 ` Dirk Roloff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403120422.44317.roloff@domain.hid \
--to=roloff@domain.hid \
--cc=adeos-main@gna.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.