From: Dave Olien <dmo@osdl.org>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 scalability within volume group
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:15:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040317181548.GA2290@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040317120005.C31599@homer.msp.redhat.com>
Thanks! The pvcreate man page I have installed now (from LVM2.00.08)
doesn't mention this option. I'll move to the cvs version and give it
a try.
Dave
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:00:05PM -0600, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 09:36:38AM -0800, Dave Olien wrote:
> > Having redundant copies of meta data is a good thing. But how about
> > allowing the adminstrator to set a limit on the degree of redundancy when
> > a VG is created. You could limit a VG to having for example 10 redundant
> > copies. Then adding more PVs beyond the 10th would encounter less overhead.
> > Am I missing something important?
>
> There'll be a VG-level option for this eventually; until then, use the
> pvcreate options to say how many copies of metadata you want on each PV.
> e.g. pvcreate --metadatacopies 0
> [Careful use of the --restorefile option lets you reduce it on a PV already in the VG.]
>
> For complex VGs you should increase the space set aside for metadata too:
> --metadatasize
>
> See the pvcreate man page.
>
> Alasdair
> --
> agk@redhat.com
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-17 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-17 17:36 [linux-lvm] LVM2 scalability within volume group Dave Olien
2004-03-17 18:00 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-03-17 18:15 ` Dave Olien [this message]
2004-03-22 22:41 ` Dave Olien
2004-03-26 22:34 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-03-30 23:19 ` Dave Olien
2004-03-17 18:12 ` Alasdair G Kergon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040317181548.GA2290@osdl.org \
--to=dmo@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.