From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: floppy driver 2.6.3 question
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:28:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040318122831.GO22234@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403181223.i2ICNkE13506@oboe.it.uc3m.es>
On Thu, Mar 18 2004, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> > > know. 128 requests have just previously been errored due to readahead
> > > and the check_media_changed result setting the driver request function
> > > to error out requests. Perhaps we have run out of requests (they're
> > > all put_ as far as I can see). Maybe the block layers get tired of
> > > talking to a device that errors requests. I'm just feeling my way!
> > > Any wild ideas are welcome!
> >
> > If the 129th request fails, then that's a pretty good clue that you
> > aren't getting the requests freed. Perhaps you are overwriting something
> > in the request after allocating it? Always mask change ->flags (don't
> > just set it), and don't overwrite ->rl.
>
> Good idea. rl is inviolate, but I set at least |=REQ_NOMERGE sometimes
> on flags. And I pass ioctl information in fake requests by setting
May I ask on what commands you set that bit?
> the bit just beyond the edge of those currently used (__REQ_BITS) to
> indicate its an ioctl and treating it specially in end request. Maybe
> on error I forgot to remove the extra bit before doing put_blk_request
Ugh, that sounds like very bad practice... The 'standard' way of doing
something like that is to flag REQ_SPECIAL and put whatever structure
you want in ->special.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-18 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-17 20:02 floppy driver 2.6.3 question Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 7:14 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 8:23 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 9:10 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 10:05 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 11:35 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 12:23 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 12:28 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-03-18 13:25 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 13:31 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 16:06 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 16:16 ` Jens Axboe
2004-03-18 18:11 ` Peter T. Breuer
2004-03-18 19:05 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040318122831.GO22234@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.