[PATCH 2.6.5-rc2] CAN-2004-0075 still valid for 2.6?

[Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 266 bytes --]

Hi Greg,

seems $subject is still valid for 2.6, no? - 2.4 got a fix 11 weeks ago.

See this: 
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/drivers/usb/vicam.c@1.15?nav=index.html|
src/|src/drivers|src/drivers/usb|hist/drivers/usb/vicam.c

Please apply.

ciao, Marc

[-- Attachment #2: CAN-2004-0075-usb-vicam.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 840 bytes --]

# drivers/usb/media/vicam.c |   13 ++++++++++---
# 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -urN linux-old/drivers/usb/media/vicam.c linux-wolk-for-2.6drivers/usb/media/vicam.c
--- linux-old/drivers/usb/media/vicam.c	2003-11-28 10:26:20.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-wolk-for-2.6drivers/usb/media/vicam.c	2004-01-15 12:10:23.000000000 -0800
@@ -653,12 +653,19 @@
 	case VIDIOCSWIN:
 		{
 
-			struct video_window *vw = (struct video_window *) arg;
-			DBG("VIDIOCSWIN %d x %d\n", vw->width, vw->height);
+			struct video_window vw;
 
-			if ( vw->width != 320 || vw->height != 240 )
+			if (copy_from_user(&vw, arg, sizeof(vw)))
+			{
 				retval = -EFAULT;
+				break;
+			}
+
+			DBG("VIDIOCSWIN %d x %d\n", vw->width, vw->height);
 			
+			if ( vw.width != 320 || vw.height != 240 )
+				retval = -EFAULT;
+
 			break;
 		}