From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.4 corruption
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:50:40 -0500
Message-ID: <20040323005040.GB3975@zero>
References: <20040322005555.GA509@zero> <200403221221.42413.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <20040323000856.GA3975@zero> <405F84C9.6020406@free.fr>
Reply-To: Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-17394-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <405F84C9.6020406@free.fr>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:28:57AM +0100, Vince wrote:
> and it looks like the second patch depends on the first one when wanting 
> to modify the same file (therefore a reject with --dry-run)...

d'oh. i should've realized that. everything's fine now.

-- 
Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE