From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i2NJOuj20406 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:24:56 -0500 Received: from percy.comedia.it (percy.comedia.it [212.97.59.71]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i2NJOsWA014188 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:24:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:24:52 +0100 From: Luca Berra Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] root on lvm Message-ID: <20040323192451.GE24728@percy.comedia.it> References: <1079478024.2432.9.camel@rich> <1079705946.29353.6.camel@tesla.mmt.bellhowell.com> <1079729272.2126.12.camel@pascal> <1079922026.2361.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1079922026.2361.7.camel@localhost> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:20:26PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: >My solution for this (so far) is to make a non-LVM2 /boot partition and >store a kernel and initrd in that. You can then build everything else as >a LVM partition. Perhaps when the available bootloaders become LVM2 >aware we'll be able to do away with a seperate /boot, but for now it >seems to be the best way to deal with it. >Cheers, >-- Jeff > > >On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 15:47, Garcia Pascal wrote: >> Hello, >> I experienced also difficulties with / and lvm2. >> configuration: >> MANDRAKE 10.0, >> kernel 2.6.3, >> lilo 22.5.8, >> reiserfs 3.6.11 ? >> lvm 2.00.08 lilo on mandrake 10.0 is lvm2 aware. i don't know if there are reiserfs related problems that affect Pascal configuration. L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \