From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kip Macy Subject: Re: Xen at scale Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:39:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040324103447.V2890@demos.bsdclusters.com> References: <0b4e01c41199$3c84a150$070414ac@pin> <20040324074648.B68293@demos.bsdclusters.com> <0be301c411c3$9cd0a1b0$070414ac@pin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <0be301c411c3$9cd0a1b0$070414ac@pin> Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Christian Limpach Cc: Keir Fraser , "MAGENHEIMER,DAN (HP-FtCollins, ex1)" , xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > and where does the builder put the PTD? and what's the physical memory > layout? For BSD both are irrelevant - the PTD is passed in as an argument via a register. Only Linux relies on physical contiguity for the PTOV trick. BSD does a table lookup in the mapped page tables - it has no physical contiguity requirements. > > > As for DOM0, different guests can have their own setup routines inside > Xen. > > I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this. That is a starting point. -Kip ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click