From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
Cc: Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@urpla.net>,
Robert_Hentosh@Dell.com,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: spurious 8259A interrupt
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:28:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040324152800.GA5758@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0403220713160.13879@chaos>
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> It isn't CPU-specific. It's motherboard glitch specific. If there
> is ground-bounce on the motherboard or excessive induced
> coupling, the CPU may occasionally get hit with a logic-level
> that it "thinks" is an interrupt, even though no controller
> actually generated it.
That doesn't seem plausible on an otherwise reliable computer.
Why would interrupt lines suffer ground-bounce logic glitches yet all
the data, address and control lines be fine?
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-24 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-16 20:32 spurious 8259A interrupt Robert_Hentosh
2004-03-19 13:06 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-19 13:16 ` Russell King
2004-03-19 13:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-19 14:04 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-03-19 14:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-19 13:48 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-03-19 14:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-21 17:58 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2004-03-22 9:12 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-03-22 12:29 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-03-24 15:28 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2004-03-24 15:50 ` Gabriel Paubert
2004-03-24 15:57 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-03-19 13:28 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-03-19 22:01 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-03-22 9:02 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-03-22 21:16 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-03-22 22:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-03-22 23:09 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-03-22 23:38 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-03-23 10:32 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-03-23 10:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-03-23 21:10 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-03-23 10:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-03-23 10:26 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-16 18:35 Emmanuel Fleury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040324152800.GA5758@mail.shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=Robert_Hentosh@Dell.com \
--cc=hpj@urpla.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.