From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Vier Subject: Re: secure delete? Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:16:16 -0500 Message-ID: <20040325031616.GA8473@zero> References: <1079691239.5767.7.camel@pear.st-and.ac.uk> <405AD31A.7070304@mweb.co.za> <20040319110748.GA30491@chihiro.cern.ch> <405AD9B5.80102@namesys.com> <405F94DD.80004@botz.org> <405FD7C2.5030605@namesys.com> <200403241820.i2OIKlDG008088@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Reply-To: Tom Vier Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403241820.i2OIKlDG008088@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 01:20:47PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > That's our official government recommendation for what's sufficient when > we're throwing away stuff that the Other Guys might actually do this to. > I have to assume that if the DoD or RCMP thought this wasn't sufficient > to protect *our* secrets, they'd have a stricter standard. they do, complete destruction. that's what they do with secret stuff. -- Tom Vier DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE