From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from colo.lackof.org (colo.lackof.org [198.49.126.79]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90217497F for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:00:41 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:00:40 -0700 From: Grant Grundler To: Randolph Chung Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Spinlock patch, take 2 Message-ID: <20040325060040.GA9159@colo.lackof.org> References: <40561EAF000035FA@ocpmta1.freegates.net> <40561EAF00003770@ocpmta1.freegates.net> <20040325072831.GT750@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20040325072831.GT750@tausq.org> Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 11:28:31PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote: > I think this is correct, but i'm not sure. i believe this is part of > the hotplug cpu patches that are being disucssed and we are waiting for > that to do more smp work. > > jejb/willy, any comments on this? I just started looking at this. We don't need cpu_present_map. We should use cpu_possible_mask in our arch/parisck/kernel/smp.c. grant