From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Kenneth W" Subject: RE: add lowpower_idle sysctl Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:20:58 -0800 Sender: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200403251920.i2PJKwF25849@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <405A29EA.6000400@mvista.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <405A29EA.6000400@mvista.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: 'Todd Poynor' Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , CPU Freq ML >>>>> Todd Poynor wrote on Thu, March 18, 2004 3:00 PM > I'd vote for using Patrick Mochel's PM subsystem and use a standard > set of identifiers that are mapped to a platform-specific idle behavior, > in much the same way as platform suspend modes are handled today. For > example, strings echoed to /sys/power/idle could be an interface. If > folks are amenable to this I'd be happy to supply a (generic) patch for it. Just wondering what is the state of development for this new PM scheme? I don't check LKML that frequently, sorry if I miss any posting on LKML. - Ken From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Kenneth W" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:20:58 +0000 Subject: RE: add lowpower_idle sysctl Message-Id: <200403251920.i2PJKwF25849@unix-os.sc.intel.com> List-Id: In-Reply-To: <405A29EA.6000400@mvista.com> References: <200403180031.i2I0VQF02038@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <200403180031.i2I0VQF02038@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: 'Todd Poynor' Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , CPU Freq ML >>>>> Todd Poynor wrote on Thu, March 18, 2004 3:00 PM > I'd vote for using Patrick Mochel's PM subsystem and use a standard > set of identifiers that are mapped to a platform-specific idle behavior, > in much the same way as platform suspend modes are handled today. For > example, strings echoed to /sys/power/idle could be an interface. If > folks are amenable to this I'd be happy to supply a (generic) patch for it. Just wondering what is the state of development for this new PM scheme? I don't check LKML that frequently, sorry if I miss any posting on LKML. - Ken From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263556AbUCYTV1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:21:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263568AbUCYTVX (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:21:23 -0500 Received: from fmr03.intel.com ([143.183.121.5]:60324 "EHLO hermes.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263538AbUCYTVT (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:21:19 -0500 Message-Id: <200403251920.i2PJKwF25849@unix-os.sc.intel.com> From: "Chen, Kenneth W" To: "'Todd Poynor'" Cc: , "Linux Kernel" , "CPU Freq ML" Subject: RE: add lowpower_idle sysctl Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:20:58 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcQNPL2OgLWS3uEOTw+kbstXJU7ZfAFYRFAQ In-Reply-To: <405A29EA.6000400@mvista.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> Todd Poynor wrote on Thu, March 18, 2004 3:00 PM > I'd vote for using Patrick Mochel's PM subsystem and use a standard > set of identifiers that are mapped to a platform-specific idle behavior, > in much the same way as platform suspend modes are handled today. For > example, strings echoed to /sys/power/idle could be an interface. If > folks are amenable to this I'd be happy to supply a (generic) patch for it. Just wondering what is the state of development for this new PM scheme? I don't check LKML that frequently, sorry if I miss any posting on LKML. - Ken