From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/2.4]: do_write_mem() return value check
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:52:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040325205248.GA18172@logos.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403231707.14088.blaisorblade_work@yahoo.it>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:59:01PM +0100, BlaisorBlade wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton, and me (I did a first fix for 2.6 and sent to him, he
> checked everything and committed it and I changed the trivial bits for 2.4).
>
> - remove unused `file *' arg from do_write_mem()
>
> - Add checking for copy_from_user() failures in do_write_mem()
>
> (Note: /dev/kmem can be written to only by root, so this *cannot* have
> security implications)
>
> - Return correct value from kmem writes() when a fault is encountered. A
> write()-style syscall's return values are:
>
> 0 when nothing was written and there was no error (someone tried to
> write zero bytes)
>
> >0: the number of bytes copied, whether or not there was an error.
> Userspace detects errors by noting that the write() return value is less
> than was requested.
>
> <0: there was an error and no bytes were copied
>
> TODO: Do the same changes for read_mem() and read_kmem(). The code is more
> messy so I must create do_read_mem() to avoid clumsy counting; I will post the
> patch first for 2.6.
Hi Paolo,
This is nice -- although I see it as a 2.6 cleanup only.
Do you actually have any practical problem caused by the current broken
"always return -EFAULT" ?
Otherwise leave it for 2.6.
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-26 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200403231707.14088.blaisorblade_work@yahoo.it>
2004-03-25 20:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
[not found] <20040326033339.GD1997@logos.cnet>
2004-03-26 18:16 ` [PATCH/2.4]: do_write_mem() return value check BlaisorBlade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040325205248.GA18172@logos.cnet \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.