From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@us.ibm.com>,
piggin@cyberone.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@osdl.org, kernel@kolivas.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
anton@samba.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:48:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040325214815.GA19060@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10030000.1080242684@flay>
* Martin J. Bligh <mbligh@aracnet.com> wrote:
> Exec time balancing is a *lot* more efficient, it just doesn't work
> for things that don't exec ... cloned threads would certainly be one
> case.
yeah - exec-balancing is a clear thing. fork/clone time balancing is
alot less clear.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-25 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-25 15:31 [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3 Nakajima, Jun
2004-03-25 15:40 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-25 19:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-25 15:21 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-25 19:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-25 20:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-29 8:45 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-29 10:20 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-03-29 5:07 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-29 11:28 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-29 17:30 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-03-30 0:01 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 1:26 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-03-29 11:20 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-29 6:01 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-29 11:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-29 7:03 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-29 7:10 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-29 20:14 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-29 23:51 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 6:34 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-30 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-30 7:07 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-30 7:14 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 7:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-30 7:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-30 7:18 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 7:48 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-30 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-30 9:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-30 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-30 7:03 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 7:13 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-30 7:24 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 7:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-30 7:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-30 7:31 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 7:38 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-30 8:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-30 8:19 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-30 8:53 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 15:27 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-25 19:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-25 21:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-03-25 22:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-29 22:30 ` Erich Focht
2004-03-30 9:05 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 10:04 ` Erich Focht
2004-03-30 10:58 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-30 16:03 ` [patch] sched-2.6.5-rc3-mm1-A0 Ingo Molnar
2004-03-31 2:30 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-30 11:02 ` [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3 Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20040330161438.GA2257@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20040330161910.GA2860@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20040330162514.GA2943@elte.hu>
2004-03-30 21:03 ` [patch] new-context balancing, 2.6.5-rc3-mm1 Ingo Molnar
2004-03-31 2:30 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-31 18:59 ` [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3 Erich Focht
2004-03-31 2:08 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-31 22:23 ` Erich Focht
2004-03-30 15:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-31 21:23 ` Erich Focht
2004-03-31 21:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-25 21:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-03-25 22:26 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-03-25 22:30 ` Andrew Theurer
2004-03-25 22:38 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-26 1:29 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-26 3:23 ` Nick Piggin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-30 21:40 Nakajima, Jun
2004-03-30 22:15 ` Andrew Theurer
[not found] <1DF7H-22Y-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1DL3x-7iG-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1DLGd-7TS-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1FmNz-72J-73@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1FnzJ-7IW-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-30 9:39 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-31 1:56 ` Nick Piggin
2004-03-25 15:15 Nakajima, Jun
2004-03-25 16:19 ` John Hawkes
2004-03-25 16:53 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040325214815.GA19060@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=ricklind@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.