From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] R2Q and more
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:50:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403281950.07829.stef.coene@docum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040324161622.2266F4014@outpost.ds9a.nl>
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 16:46, Mihai Vlad wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I have several questions:
>
> Let's take a real case example...
> A connection of 256kbit split among some clients (8kbit RATE, 1500 QUANTUM
> - set manually).
> I use esfq to split the bandwidth as fair as possible.
>
> Q1. What happens if the SUM of all the clients' class RATE (+ the
> default class RATE) is smaller than 256kbit? Will HTB work correctly?
Yes.
> Q2. What happens if the SUM of all the clients' class RATE (+ the
> default class RATE) is bigger than 256kbit? Will HTB work correctly?
Yes.
> Q3. What happens if the ISP does not guarantee a "full 256kbit"
> bandwidth?
> (Suppose that I set my Linux box to shape 256kbit and my ISP provides me
> only 128kbit during high-traffic hours). Will HTB work correctly?
Yes.
> Q4. As far as I understood R2Q means the ratio between the RATE and the
> QUANTUM of a class... Which is more "powerful"? The RATE, or the QUANTUM?
> (e.g. ClassA---QUANTUM 3000---RATE 8kbit, or
> ClassB---QUANTUM 1500---RATE 16kbit)
r2q is used to calculate the default quantum of a class: quantum = rate / r2q
But you can overrule this default quantum when you add a class.
> Q5. The HTB Manual says that the sum of the LEAF CLASSES RATE must be
> equal to the PARENT CLASS RATE. Is there such a rule for QUANTUMS?
No.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-28 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-24 15:46 [LARTC] R2Q and more Mihai Vlad
2004-03-28 17:50 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2004-03-28 19:18 ` Roy
2004-03-28 21:05 ` Stef Coene
2004-03-28 23:44 ` Roy
2004-03-29 6:55 ` Mihai Vlad
2004-03-29 9:23 ` Stef Coene
2004-03-29 15:11 ` Roy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403281950.07829.stef.coene@docum.org \
--to=stef.coene@docum.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.