From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:12:06 +0000
Subject: Re: E250 LED indicators
Message-Id: <20040331141206.4a3486de.davem@redhat.com>
List-Id: <sparclinux.vger.kernel.org>
References: <406B2256.6000308@usa.net>
In-Reply-To: <406B2256.6000308@usa.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:56:06 -0800
Eric Brower <ebrower@usa.net> wrote:

> DaveM-- I'll float you a sysctl 
> patch for sparc64 and sparc if you'd consider it and find the current 
> "protection" valuable, otherwise perhaps machine_power_off should 
> actually power-off, machine_halt should halt and userspace commands 
> should get smarter about whether they ask the system to halt or 
> power-off.

Ok, I'll check it out.