From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 01 Apr 2004 18:31:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from p508B578D.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.87.141]:29234 "EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:31:58 +0100 Received: from fluff.linux-mips.net (fluff.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i31HVuoM029524; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:31:56 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by fluff.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i31HVsWI029522; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:31:54 +0200 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:31:54 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Brian Murphy Cc: "Steven J. Hill" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: BUG in pcnet32.c? Message-ID: <20040401173154.GA30634@linux-mips.org> References: <4068809F.8070103@murphy.dk> <4068864D.1020209@realitydiluted.com> <406B2E90.5060307@murphy.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <406B2E90.5060307@murphy.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 4717 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 10:48:16PM +0200, Brian Murphy wrote: > Not sure what you mean. I get the panic "Break instruction in kernel > code" from do_bp > in traps.c. This seems like a strange "assertion" to me... The more information BUG or BUG_ON provide the bigger the kernel gets. Using a simple break instruction was simply the smallest thing. The previous, just slightly more verbose BUG() implementation did result in ~ 87k of bloat ... Ralf