From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Breeds Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 02:20:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH 5/5] remove concatenation with Message-Id: <20040404022019.GU3445@bakeyournoodle.com> List-Id: References: <20040322052155.GF17221@bakeyournoodle.com> In-Reply-To: <20040322052155.GF17221@bakeyournoodle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:55:31PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > 2. Some of these aren't related to $SUBJECT (__FUNCTION__), but are > correct IIRC (for some versions of gcc). Can someone confirm that? By way of a followup see: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m8060877327415 I think from my point of view the best way to handle this would be, ignore the varargs issue unless I'm already editing a statement that contains the bug (or I created the bug myself). Then if it is desirable to fix all the places where gcc-2.95 has problems with varargs I can generate a separate patch for that. Yours Tony linux.conf.au http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ Apr 18-23 2005 The Australian Linux Technical Conference! _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors